Bowline Review & Support
Someone comes and looks. You get it in writing.
An in-person review of your working practices, documents, evidence, and AI use. You receive written findings, prioritised actions, and agreed support over 12 months.
Twelve-month commitment. Scope and commercial terms are agreed before paid work begins.
What you get
- 01An in-person reviewSomeone walks the business and sees how it actually works.
- 02The Operational ReportEvery finding, its source, severity, and prioritised recommended action.
- 03The Governance SummaryTwo pages for owners, leadership teams, boards, or trustees.
- 04The Bowline Reviewed badgeA current-status indicator valid only while the Review & Support service remains active.
- 05Quarterly change reportsRelevant legal, regulatory, and official-guidance changes with practical impact notes.
How it starts
See how the work happens.
Your practitioner talks to your team and observes their systems, information, and AI tools, on site or through direct observation as agreed. Structured questions keep the review consistent.
- Stage oneWalk the businessSites, people, systems in daily use, and the decisions already being made.
- Stage twoRead what existsReview the agreed existing documents, supplier agreements, and relevant history as evidence and context.
- Stage threeCheck the claimsEvery claim traced to a document or evidence trail, or recorded as unevidenced.
- Stage fourWrite it upFindings set out with a risk level and a practical resolution for each.
Every review follows the same documented method, so each finding can be traced back to what was seen, read, or said.
For your team
The Operational Report.
Every finding identifies its source, evidence, and recommended action. Finding severity, action priority, and likely effort are shown separately so one label never stands in for another.
- ImmediateStart now because the issue cannot reasonably wait.
- Within 90 daysSchedule a near-term action with a named owner.
- This yearPlan the action into the annual work programme.
- MonitorKeep the position under review and retain supporting evidence.
Findings: data protection and AI
- DP-04HighImmediateSmall effort
The privacy policy has not been updated since 2023.
- Source
- Existing privacy policy reviewed alongside ownership interviews.
- Evidence
- It names a contact who has left and two systems no longer in use.
- Recommended action
- Assign an owner to arrange a separately scoped update and approval.
- DP-07ModerateWithin 90 daysModerate effort
Supplier access is never reviewed after onboarding.
- Source
- Supplier register, access records, and staff interviews.
- Evidence
- Four of seven providers hold live access with no dated review record.
- Recommended action
- Set an annual access review with a named owner and retained evidence.
- AI-02ModerateWithin 90 daysSmall effort
AI tools are already in use, but no approved approach has been agreed.
- Source
- Staff interviews, the acceptable-use policy, and supplier records.
- Evidence
- Several staff use public AI tools for drafting and meeting summaries. There is no approved-tools list or clear rule for company, customer, or personal information.
- Recommended action
- Agree permitted uses and data-handling rules, name an owner, and record approved AI tools.
How findings are reached
Document issues become report findings.
Document gaps, contradictions, outdated wording, and unsupported claims go into the Operational Report, informed by interviews, working practices, and evidence. Review & Support does not annotate, amend, or rewrite your documents.
Findings arising from document review
- DR-02ModerateWithin 90 daysModerate effort
The documented retention approach does not match current practice.
- Source
- Retention schedule compared with staff interviews and system settings.
- Evidence
- Two record groups have no agreed period and the system setting differs from the schedule.
- Recommended action
- Decide and approve the periods, then arrange any drafting or amendment under a separate scope.
- DR-05HighImmediateSmall effort
The privacy notice names an inactive contact route.
- Source
- Published notice compared with the current enquiry process.
- Evidence
- Messages sent to the published address are not monitored by the named owner.
- Recommended action
- Assign an owner and arrange a separately scoped notice update and approval.
For owners and leadership
The Governance Summary.
Two pages for owners, leadership teams, boards, or trustees. Plain English, simple graphics, and the issues that need a leadership decision.
Current status
Action needed
Three issues need a decision this quarter. None of them are expensive.
By area
- GovernanceWatch
- Data protectionAction needed
- Cyber securityGood
- AIWatch
What needs your attention
- Your privacy policy is three years out of date.
It names a contact who has left. Anyone asking to see it today would be given the wrong information.
- Nobody reviews supplier access once it is granted.
Four suppliers can still reach your systems. No one has checked whether they still need to.
- Staff use AI tools without agreed rules.
Several people use public AI tools for drafting and meeting notes. Nobody has said what information can go into them.
For your customers
Bowline Reviewed.
The Reviewed badge is a graphical indicator that the organisation has recently completed a Bowline review and has an active Bowline Review & Support service.
- Shows a current status and review period
- Supplied in light and dark versions, as SVG and PNG
- Valid only while the Review & Support service remains active
- Not certification, accreditation, or a guarantee of compliance
Illustrative example: fictional organisation and details.
Quarterly change reports
What changed, and what it means for you.
Each quarter, a short report explains relevant changes to law and official guidance, including commencement dates and practical implications for cyber security, data protection, and AI governance.
A new data duty and cyber action
Data protection complaints now need a clear process
- What changed
- From 19 June 2026, organisations must help people make data protection complaints, acknowledge them within 30 days, and respond without undue delay.
- What it means here
- Add a clear complaints route, name an owner, and record acknowledgements, decisions, and response dates.
Boards are being asked to own cyber risk
- What changed
- The voluntary Cyber Resilience Pledge asks organisations to put cyber security at board level, use NCSC Early Warning, and assess Cyber Essentials across suppliers.
- What it means here
- Record who owns cyber risk, review it at leadership level, and check what security evidence key suppliers provide.
Scope and boundaries
Clear support. Clear limits.
Your 12-month scope reflects your organisation’s size, complexity, sites, entities, document volume, and frequency of support. We agree it in writing before paid work begins.
What is included
- An in-person or directly observed review of practice, documents, and available evidence
- Review of an agreed set of existing documents as evidence and context
- Findings recorded in the Operational Report
- Relevant leadership-level findings reflected in the Governance Summary
- Prioritised actions and agreed ongoing support within the service scope
- The Bowline Reviewed badge
- Quarterly legal, regulatory, and guidance change reports with practical impact notes
- Regular review calls at the agreed cadence
Bowline Compliance Limited is not a law firm. Formal scope and commercial terms are agreed in writing before paid work starts.
Arrange an initial conversation
Discuss Review & Support.
A short enquiry starts the conversation about your 12-month service. Scope and commercial terms are agreed in writing before paid work begins.
Arrange an initial conversation